|
You are
a marketing manager interviewing for a new job at several different firms
simultaneously. You expect to be asked the same questions in each interview
dealing with what you think are some good new marketing opportunities for
each firm to pursue. You know that being well prepared for an interview gives
you a better chance of being offered the job, so you decided to study each
company where you are interviewing.
Pick
any 3 firms to research. Based on Internet research on these companies, write
a 500–750-word research paper proposing at least 3 marketing opportunities
that you would strongly suggest that each firm pursue. In your arguments,
include the following:
·
Describe your reasoning for identifying them as worthy of
pursuing.
·
Categorize each marketing opportunity as low-hanging fruit, home
runs, or singles, and discuss why (see definitions in course materials).
·
Discuss the risk in pursuing each opportunity.
·
Without actually trying to determine each project’s ROE, which
would you most strongly recommend implementing, and why?
·
Explain how the marketing opportunity would reflect upon the
firm. Would it have a positive or negative public relations effect on the
firm? Would it result in great financial improvements, or only a minor
improvement?
|
CRJS300-1203B-02 Proseminar in Criminal Justice
|
|
Assignment
Name:
|
Unit 3
Individual Project
|
|
Deliverable Length:
|
4-6 pages
|
|
Details:
|
The
United States criminal justice system has a court system that is modulated in
different parts. The Supreme Court is the highest authoritative court in the
United States, and for cases to arrive at this court, they must pass through
a variety of courts and have a legitimate consequence toward the nation.
You
also have state, appellate, and local courts that serve jurisdictions where
criminal cases must be trialed and sentenced for fair due process of every
citizen that is a suspect. It is vital to understand that certain crimes like
fraud can be tried not only in the criminal sections of the criminal justice
system but also in the civil, where another set of courts provide judgments
over cases that do not have to be criminal but of assets.
Please
answer the following questions. As you answer each question you must provide
support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers.
Academic criminal justice articles or real-life criminal justice findings
that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in
supporting your answers. Please use APA style for all cited sources including
your resource page.
·
What is the dual-court system? Why do we have a dual-court
system in America? Could the drive toward court unification eventually lead
to a monolithic court system? Would such a system be effective?
·
Judges have specific philosophical rationales and sentencing
guidelines when providing a judgment over presented facts. If you were a
judge, what would be your sentencing goals and philosophical rationales? Why?
Can you envision any circumstances that might make your guidelines or
sentencing goals change? Why? Provide an example of a situation that might be
extremely difficult to judge that could put you as a judge in a situation to
change your sentencing goals or philosophical rationales.
|
|
